Read
AUTHORPÆDIA is hosted by Authorpædia Foundation, Inc. a U.S. non-profit organization.
Taras Shevchenko
| Click here to leave a new message, LINK to any article you want me to look at And sign your posts using ~~~~. I may not bother with posts where articles are not linked and posts are not signed. I may just delete them and ignore them and you. I do not review drafts on request, nor, normally, do I review a draft more than once, so please do not ask If you want me to do something for you, make it easy for me, please. |
| This is the home account for Fiddle Faddle, which is both my nickname and my alternate account. When you begin a new message section here, I will respond to it here. When I leave message on your Talk page, I will watch your page for your response. This maintains discussion threads and continuity. See Help:Talk page#How to keep a two-way conversation readable. If you want to use {{Talkback}} or {{ping}} to alert me about messages elsewhere, please feel free to do so. |
| It is 5:23 AM where this user lives. If it's the middle of the night or during the working day they may well not be online. For accurate time please the page |
|
|
I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, even if vile, as they speak more against the attacker than against me. |
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In the event that what you seek is not here then it is archived (0.9 probability). While you are welcome to potter through the archives the meaning of life is not there.
Request to Restore Draft to User Space
Dear Timtrent,
I understand and respect the deletion of Draft:Surya Devan under CSD G11. I acknowledge a conflict of interest and won’t attempt to resubmit the article prematurely.
However, I’d like to continue working on the content offline. Would you be willing to restore the deleted draft to my user subpage at User:SuryaDevanE/SuryaDevan?
I assure you this is solely for sandbox editing and learning, not for immediate resubmission. Thank you for your time and consideration.
— SuryaDevanE (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC) SuryaDevanE (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- @SuryaDevanE You may be abe to persuade someone else to. I am not minded to do so, I'm afraid. I abhor self promotion. I note that your occupation is as some sort of media strategist. Self promotion on Wikipedia is very poor strategy. LinkedIn or Twitter or BlueSky is a far better set of vehicles for self promotion 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 19:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Your Review of Joanna Stadium Article
Hello,
In regard to your review of this article: Draft:Joanna_Stadium
You said in your review comment, "... I cannot see sufficent to get this over the high WP:N bar." Should I take that as advice to fix and resubmit? Or is the subject not popular enough, so don't bother to resubmit?
Please advise. Cheers Sven's carrots (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) I'd assume it's just the lack of content and refs. The article says the stadium operated for 30 years before the rebuild but doesn't mention a whole lot about what happened during this time relative to the time it operated. Surely there is more to be written for this period that would let you establish notability? Otherwise, I guess you'll have to wait for the regeneration to be completed as we don't really predict the future. OXYLYPSE (talk) 23:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)