Not logged in | Create account | Login

    Authorpædia Trademarks

    Social buttons

    Languages

    Read

    AUTHORPÆDIA is hosted by Authorpædia Foundation, Inc. a U.S. non-profit organization.

Svetlana Velmar-Janković

Former good articleJoe Biden was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 18, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
September 19, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2020Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 28, 2020Good article reassessmentDelisted
October 4, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on August 23, 2008.
Current status: Delisted good article

    Current consensus

    NOTE: It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as:
    [[Talk:Joe Biden#Current consensus|current consensus]] item [n]
    To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to purge this page.

    1. In the lead section, mention that Biden is the oldest president. (RfC February 2021)

    2. There is no consensus on including a subsection about gaffes. (RfC March 2021)

    3. The infobox is shortened. (RfC February 2021)

    4. The lead image is the official 2021 White House portrait. (January 2021, April 2021)

    5. The lead image's caption is Official portrait, 2021. (April 2021)

    6. In the lead sentence, use who is as opposed to serving as when referring to Biden as the president. (RfC July 2021)

    7. In the lead section, do not mention Biden's building of a port to facilitate American aid to Palestinians. (RfC June 2024)

    Jake Tapper's book

    I accidentally hit revert when I meant to leave an edit summary. An entire section devoted to this book, sourced to Amazon, is clearly WP:UNDUE – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Ceasefire agreement in the lede

    @Esterau16 The criteria for including information in the lede of an article is not purely whether or not that information is true, it's also whether it's notable. As I've explained when I made the edit, the ceasefire that was backed by Biden did not last more than a few months (additionally, there were still killings during the so-called ceasefire). The lede's purpose is to summarize the entirety of Biden's life and work, it seems obvious to me that backing this short-lived ceasefire agreement is far from making the cut. WikiFouf (talk) 16:27, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]