Muhammad Yunus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 01:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rimal Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a model and actress, whose only stated claim of notability is that she just started filming her first-ever film role two weeks ago, in a film not slated to be released until sometime next year. As always, every performer does not automatically get a Wikipedia inclusion freebie just because she can be verified as existing -- she needs to pass WP:NACTOR, and she needs more sourcing than has been shown here, for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - See: Express Tribune, Forbes, Dunya News and The News. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Week Delete agree with nom. the subject received press coverage but this is WP:TOOSOON. --Saqib (talk) 06:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as I know she fails WP:NACTOR but we keep article based on achievement. She has achieved the status of first transgender model in a strict religious country and the coverage is enough as other sources always exist in Urdu language or other local language. Greenbörg (talk) 10:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Greenbörg. The transgender background is significant in terms of coverage. Mar4d (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.