Mikhail Gorbachev

TheToolX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, fails WP:GNG.   haj • talk   11:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites.   haj • talk   11:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  can u please let me know the reason for deleting this page. Helio112 (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: sources seem to be largely self published, UGC or press releases. Article reads as promotional and there isn't any claim to notability. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 11:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per DandelionAndBurdock's assessment; article is promotional and subject fails GNG. MidnightMayhem 12:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This was just published 17 minutes ago -theinscribermag.com/how-thetoolx-com-became-a-viral-platform-for-online-tools-everyone-can-use/, unsigned/staff writer and reads like a promo regardless and it's blocked by the spam filter here. I don't see any coverage we can use to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and promotional. Madeleine (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero reliable third-party sources. I became aware of this AfD because of the blacklist hits; relying heavily on blacklisted PR sites is usually a strong sign that a topic is not notable.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No WP:RS Schützenpanzer (Talk) 13:52, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]